TY - JOUR
T1 - A synthesis of multi-taxa management experiments to guide forest biodiversity conservation in Europe
AU - Tinya, Flóra
AU - Doerfler, Inken
AU - de Groot, Maarten
AU - Heilman-Clausen, Jacob
AU - Kovács, Bence
AU - Mårell, Anders
AU - Nordén, Björn
AU - Aszalós, Réka
AU - Bässler, Claus
AU - Brazaitis, Gediminas
AU - Burrascano, Sabina
AU - Camprodon, Jordi
AU - Chudomelová, Markéta
AU - Čížek, Lukáš
AU - D'Andrea, Ettore
AU - Gossner, Martin
AU - Halme, Panu
AU - Hédl, Radim
AU - Korboulewsky, Nathalie
AU - Kouki, Jari
AU - Kozel, Petr
AU - Lõhmus, Asko
AU - López, Rosana
AU - Máliš, František
AU - Martín, Juan A.
AU - Matteucci, Giorgio
AU - Mattioli, Walter
AU - Mundet, Roser
AU - Müller, Jörg
AU - Nicolas, Manuel
AU - Oldén, Anna
AU - Piqué, Míriam
AU - Preikša, Žydrūnas
AU - Rovira Ciuró, Joan
AU - Remm, Liina
AU - Schall, Peter
AU - Šebek, Pavel
AU - Seibold, Sebastian
AU - Simončič, Primož
AU - Ujházy, Karol
AU - Ujházyová, Mariana
AU - Vild, Ondřej
AU - Vincenot, Lucie
AU - Weisser, Wolfgang
AU - Ódor, Péter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Most European forests are used for timber production. Given the limited extent of unmanaged (and especially primary) forests, it is essential to include commercial forests in the conservation of forest biodiversity. In order to develop ecologically sustainable forest management practices, it is important to understand the management impacts on forest-dwelling organisms. Experiments allow testing the effects of alternative management strategies, and monitoring of multiple taxa informs us on the response range across forest-dwelling organisms. To provide a representative picture of the currently available information, metadata on 28 multi-taxa forest management experiments were collected from 14 European countries. We demonstrate the potential of compiling these experiments in a single network to upscale results from the local to continental level and indicate directions for future research. Among the different forest types, temperate deciduous beech and oak-dominated forests are the best represented in the multi-taxa management experiments. Of all the experimental treatments, innovative ways of traditional management techniques (e.g., gap cutting and thinning) and conservation-oriented interventions (e.g., microhabitat enrichment) provide the best opportunity for large-scale analyses. Regarding the organism groups, woody regeneration, herbs, fungi, beetles, bryophytes, birds and lichens offer the largest potential for addressing management–biodiversity relationships at the European level. We identified knowledge gaps regarding boreal, hemiboreal and broadleaved evergreen forests, the treatments of large herbivore exclusion, prescribed burning and forest floor or water manipulations, and the monitoring of soil-dwelling organisms and some vertebrate classes, e.g., amphibians, reptiles and mammals. To improve multi-site comparisons, design of future experiments should be fitted to the set-up of the ongoing projects and standardised biodiversity sampling is suggested. However, the network described here opens the way to learn lessons on the impact on forest biodiversity of different management techniques at the continental level, and thus, supports biodiversity conservation in managed forests.
AB - Most European forests are used for timber production. Given the limited extent of unmanaged (and especially primary) forests, it is essential to include commercial forests in the conservation of forest biodiversity. In order to develop ecologically sustainable forest management practices, it is important to understand the management impacts on forest-dwelling organisms. Experiments allow testing the effects of alternative management strategies, and monitoring of multiple taxa informs us on the response range across forest-dwelling organisms. To provide a representative picture of the currently available information, metadata on 28 multi-taxa forest management experiments were collected from 14 European countries. We demonstrate the potential of compiling these experiments in a single network to upscale results from the local to continental level and indicate directions for future research. Among the different forest types, temperate deciduous beech and oak-dominated forests are the best represented in the multi-taxa management experiments. Of all the experimental treatments, innovative ways of traditional management techniques (e.g., gap cutting and thinning) and conservation-oriented interventions (e.g., microhabitat enrichment) provide the best opportunity for large-scale analyses. Regarding the organism groups, woody regeneration, herbs, fungi, beetles, bryophytes, birds and lichens offer the largest potential for addressing management–biodiversity relationships at the European level. We identified knowledge gaps regarding boreal, hemiboreal and broadleaved evergreen forests, the treatments of large herbivore exclusion, prescribed burning and forest floor or water manipulations, and the monitoring of soil-dwelling organisms and some vertebrate classes, e.g., amphibians, reptiles and mammals. To improve multi-site comparisons, design of future experiments should be fitted to the set-up of the ongoing projects and standardised biodiversity sampling is suggested. However, the network described here opens the way to learn lessons on the impact on forest biodiversity of different management techniques at the continental level, and thus, supports biodiversity conservation in managed forests.
KW - Deadwood
KW - Forestry treatment
KW - Gap cutting
KW - Microhabitat enrichment
KW - Multi-taxon
KW - Thinning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164704725&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02553
DO - 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02553
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85164704725
SN - 2351-9894
VL - 46
JO - Global Ecology and Conservation
JF - Global Ecology and Conservation
M1 - e02553
ER -