TY - JOUR
T1 - A Clinical model to identify patients with high-risk coronary artery disease
AU - Yang, Yelin
AU - Chen, Li
AU - Yam, Yeung
AU - Achenbach, Stephan
AU - Al-Mallah, Mouaz
AU - Berman, Daniel S.
AU - Budoff, Matthew J.
AU - Cademartiri, Filippo
AU - Callister, Tracy Q.
AU - Chang, Hyuk Jae
AU - Cheng, Victor Y.
AU - Chinnaiyan, Kavitha
AU - Cury, Ricardo
AU - Delago, Augustin
AU - Dunning, Allison
AU - Feuchtner, Gudrun
AU - Hadamitzky, Martin
AU - Hausleiter, Jörg
AU - Karlsberg, Ronald P.
AU - Kaufmann, Philipp A.
AU - Kim, Yong Jin
AU - Leipsic, Jonathon
AU - Labounty, Troy
AU - Lin, Fay
AU - Maffei, Erica
AU - Raff, Gilbert L.
AU - Shaw, Leslee J.
AU - Villines, Todd C.
AU - Min, James K.
AU - Chow, Benjamin J.W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Objectives This study sought to develop a clinical model that identifies patients with and without high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD). Background Although current clinical models help to estimate a patient's pre-test probability of obstructive CAD, they do not accurately identify those patients with and without high-risk coronary anatomy. Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected multinational coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) cohort was conducted. High-risk anatomy was defined as left main diameter stenosis ≥50%, 3-vessel disease with diameter stenosis ≥70%, or 2-vessel disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery. Using a cohort of 27,125, patients with a history of CAD, cardiac transplantation, and congenital heart disease were excluded. The model was derived from 24,251 consecutive patients in the derivation cohort and an additional 7,333 nonoverlapping patients in the validation cohort. Results The risk score consisted of 9 variables: age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, hyperlipidemia, family history of CAD, history of peripheral vascular disease, and chest pain symptoms. Patients were divided into 3 risk categories: low (≤7 points), intermediate (8 to 17 points) and high (≥18 points). The model was statistically robust with area under the curve of 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 0.78) in the derivation cohort and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69 to 0.74) in the validation cohort. Patients who scored ≤7 points had a low negative likelihood ratio (<0.1), whereas patients who scored ≥18 points had a high specificity of 99.3% and a positive likelihood ratio (8.48). In the validation group, the prevalence of high-risk CAD was 1% in patients with ≤7 points and 16.7% in those with ≥18 points. Conclusions We propose a scoring system, based on clinical variables, that can be used to identify patients at high and low pre-test probability of having high-risk CAD. Identification of these populations may detect those who may benefit from a trial of medical therapy and those who may benefit most from an invasive strategy.
AB - Objectives This study sought to develop a clinical model that identifies patients with and without high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD). Background Although current clinical models help to estimate a patient's pre-test probability of obstructive CAD, they do not accurately identify those patients with and without high-risk coronary anatomy. Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected multinational coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) cohort was conducted. High-risk anatomy was defined as left main diameter stenosis ≥50%, 3-vessel disease with diameter stenosis ≥70%, or 2-vessel disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery. Using a cohort of 27,125, patients with a history of CAD, cardiac transplantation, and congenital heart disease were excluded. The model was derived from 24,251 consecutive patients in the derivation cohort and an additional 7,333 nonoverlapping patients in the validation cohort. Results The risk score consisted of 9 variables: age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, hyperlipidemia, family history of CAD, history of peripheral vascular disease, and chest pain symptoms. Patients were divided into 3 risk categories: low (≤7 points), intermediate (8 to 17 points) and high (≥18 points). The model was statistically robust with area under the curve of 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 0.78) in the derivation cohort and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69 to 0.74) in the validation cohort. Patients who scored ≤7 points had a low negative likelihood ratio (<0.1), whereas patients who scored ≥18 points had a high specificity of 99.3% and a positive likelihood ratio (8.48). In the validation group, the prevalence of high-risk CAD was 1% in patients with ≤7 points and 16.7% in those with ≥18 points. Conclusions We propose a scoring system, based on clinical variables, that can be used to identify patients at high and low pre-test probability of having high-risk CAD. Identification of these populations may detect those who may benefit from a trial of medical therapy and those who may benefit most from an invasive strategy.
KW - computed tomographic coronary angiography
KW - high-risk coronary artery disease
KW - risk factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928158867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.11.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.11.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 25797120
AN - SCOPUS:84928158867
SN - 1936-878X
VL - 8
SP - 427
EP - 434
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 4
ER -