Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Land Use
100%
Forest Management
88%
Beech
72%
Picea Abies
60%
Europeans
55%
Forestry
51%
Mixed Forest
42%
Climate Change
38%
Fagus Sylvatica
28%
Land Cover
23%
Forest Stands
21%
Abies Alba
21%
Forest Ecosystem
21%
Deforestation
21%
Agroforestry
20%
Fir
20%
Plantation
19%
Decision Making
19%
Case Study
17%
Purity
16%
Cropland
15%
Mixed Stands
15%
Stand Structure
14%
Pinus
13%
Mountains
13%
Growth Models
13%
Heartwood
12%
Timber Production
12%
Reforestation
11%
Annuals
10%
Forest Inventory
10%
Optimization Model
9%
Tropical Forest
9%
Monte Carlo Method
8%
Ecosystem Management
8%
Forest Growth
8%
Natural Regeneration
8%
Arable Land
8%
Silviculture
7%
Uneven-Aged Stands
7%
Tree Growth
7%
National Parks
7%
Forest Regeneration
7%
Carbon Sink
7%
Forest Types
7%
Survival Rate
6%
Forest Dynamics
6%
Biomass Production
6%
Afforestation
6%
Dryers
6%
Keyphrases
Tree Species
59%
Forest Management
47%
Ecosystem Services
45%
Land Use
43%
Mixed Forest
39%
Norway Spruce
36%
Net Present Value
31%
Forestry
29%
Beech
29%
Forest Planning
27%
Spruce
26%
Germany
25%
Fagus Sylvatica
25%
European Beech
25%
Climate Change
24%
Forest Enterprises
20%
Cropland
20%
Timber Price
19%
Deforestation
18%
Natural Forest
18%
Economic Consequences
18%
Agroforestry
17%
Pasture
17%
Biodiversity
17%
Bavaria
15%
Multiple Ecosystem Services
15%
Church Forest
15%
Land Cover Change
15%
Economic Returns
14%
Discount Rate
14%
Risk Aversion
14%
Land Use Land Cover
14%
Timber
14%
Survival Probability
14%
Opportunity Cost
13%
Ecological Economics
13%
Mixed Stands
13%
Southern Ecuador
12%
Ethiopian Church
12%
Ungulate Browsing
12%
Shashemene
12%
Decision Maker
12%
Uneven-aged Forest
12%
Reforestation
11%
Ecosystem Service Value
11%
Financial Returns
11%
Optimization Model
11%
Municipal Forest
11%
Timber Production
11%
Picea Abies (L.) Karst
11%
